2000
#75,695
National surname rank
First available Census row
A habitational surname likely derived from a place name in France.
According to the 2020 US Census Bureau surname tables, roughly 329 Americans carry the last name Blige. That puts it at #72,902 in the national surname ranking, appearing at a frequency of 0.10 per 100,000 people (about 1 in 1,041,806 residents).
This page is the full Name Census profile for the Blige surname. You will find the Census Bureau frequency data, a multi-census history view, an ancestry and ethnicity breakdown based on self-reported demographics, the name's meaning and origin where available, and answers to the most common questions people ask about this surname.
Bearers in the US
329
1 in 1,041,806
Census rank
#72,902
2020 decennial data
Per 100,000
0.1
Frequency rate
Recorded bearers
287
very rare in the US
Popularity narrative
The Census Bureau recorded 287 bearers of the surname Blige in its 2020 decennial surname file. At a rate of 0.10 per 100,000 residents, it holds the 72902nd position in the national surname ranking.
Among Census respondents with the surname Blige, the largest self-reported group is Black at 85.7%. The next largest groups are White (7.3%) and Two or More Races (3.5%).
Origin
The surname Blige originated in France, specifically in the region of Normandy. It can be traced back to the 12th century and is believed to have derived from the Old French word "blige," which refers to a type of coarse woolen fabric. This suggests that the name may have originally been associated with someone who worked with this particular fabric, perhaps a weaver or a merchant.
One of the earliest recorded instances of the name can be found in the Livre des Bourgeois de Rouen, a 13th-century manuscript that documented the citizens of Rouen, a city in Normandy. In this manuscript, the name appears as "Blige," indicating that the modern spelling was likely established at that time.
During the Middle Ages, the Blige family appears to have been well-established in the region of Normandy. Records from the 14th century mention a Jean Blige, who was a landowner in the village of Blignicourt, which may have derived its name from the Blige family.
In the 15th century, the name Blige gained prominence with the birth of Jacques Blige (1420-1498), a renowned scholar and theologian who served as the Bishop of Avranches in Normandy. His writings and contributions to the church during this period have been well-documented.
Another notable figure with the surname Blige was Étienne Blige (1565-1631), a French explorer and navigator who accompanied Samuel de Champlain on several expeditions to the Americas. Blige played a crucial role in establishing trade routes and settlements in what is now Quebec, Canada.
In the 17th century, the Blige family expanded beyond France as members of the family emigrated to other parts of Europe and the Americas. One such figure was Henri Blige (1625-1698), who settled in the Dutch colony of New Netherland (present-day New York) and became a prominent merchant and landowner.
As the centuries passed, the Blige surname continued to spread across the world, with notable individuals bearing the name in various fields. One example is Emily Blige (1821-1897), a British writer and social reformer who advocated for women's rights and education.
Throughout its history, the surname Blige has been associated with a diverse range of individuals, from clergymen and scholars to explorers and merchants, reflecting the rich tapestry of human experiences and contributions.
Demographics
Among Census respondents with the surname Blige, the largest self-reported group is Black at 85.7%. The next largest groups are White (7.3%) and Two or More Races (3.5%).
The bar chart below shows how Blige bearers described their own race and ethnicity on the 2020 Census form. The Census Bureau groups responses into six broad categories: White, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Two or More Races. When a category has too few respondents for a given surname, the Bureau suppresses the figure to protect individual privacy, which is why some names show fewer than six slices.
Percentages are shown for every Census year so the breakdown stays comparable over time. When the source file also includes raw headcounts, Name Census shows those alongside the percentages in the legend.
Keep in mind that these are self-reported numbers. A person's surname does not determine their race or ethnicity, and the distribution you see here reflects the specific population who happened to carry the Blige surname at the time of the 2020 Census, not any inherent property of the name itself.
Timeline
Blige appears in 3 published Census surname files: 2000, 2010, 2020. The cards below show how the name's rank and bearer count changed across each release.
2000
National surname rank
First available Census row
2010
National surname rank
+32 bearers (+13.5%)
2020
National surname rank
+18 bearers (+6.7%)
| Year | Rank | Count | Per 100K | Count change | Rank change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | #75,695 | 237 | 0.09 | First available Census row | First available Census row |
| 2010 | #72,332 | 269 | 0.09 | +32 bearers (+13.5%) | Up 3,363 places |
| 2020 | #72,902 | 287 | 0.10 | +18 bearers (+6.7%) | Down 570 places |
For 2020, the Census Bureau published race and Hispanic-origin columns as counts rather than percentages. Name Census converts those counts back into shares so the ancestry section stays comparable with the older surname files.
Year on year
How has the Blige surname changed between Census years? The chart shows bearer count side by side, and the table compares rank, count, and frequency.
Census year comparison
| Metric | 2010 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | #72,332 | #72,902 | -0.8% |
| Count | 269 | 287 | 6.7% |
| Per 100K | 0.09 | 0.10 | 6.7% |
Between the 2010 and 2020 Census, the number of Blige bearers went from 269 to 287 (+6.7% change). The surname moved down 570 positions in the national ranking, going from #72,332 to #72,902.
Notable bearers
FAQ
Name Census estimates that about 329 living Americans carry the surname Blige. Using the current population baseline, that works out to roughly 1 in 1,041,806 residents.
Blige ranks #72,902 in the 2020 Census surname tables and is classified on this site as "Very Rare." The Census recorded the name at a frequency of 0.10 per 100,000 residents, which is about 0 people out of every 100,000.
The raw 2020 Census file counted 287 people with the surname Blige. That is different from the site's living-bearer estimate (329), which projects the surname's present-day count by applying the Census frequency rate to the current U.S. population.
It is the Census Bureau's normalized frequency measure. A rate of 0.10 per 100,000 means that if you picked a random group of 100,000 U.S. residents, you would expect about 0 of them to have the surname Blige.
Between 2010 and 2020, the surname Blige went from 269 recorded bearers to 287. That is an increase of 18 (+6.7%). In the national ranking it fell from #72,332 to #72,902.
Among Census respondents with the surname Blige, the largest self-reported group is Black at 85.7%. The next largest groups are White (7.3%) and Two or More Races (3.5%). These figures come from the 2020 Census Bureau surname tables, based on how respondents described their own race and ethnicity.
Black is the largest self-reported group for the surname Blige in the 2020 Census, accounting for 85.7% (246 people in the source table).
Blige appears across multiple self-reported groups in the Census data. The largest shares in the 2020 file are Black (85.7%), White (7.3%), Two or More Races (3.5%). For 2020, the source file also published raw headcounts for each group, which is why this page can show both percentages and counts in the ancestry section.
Yes. This page is using the latest surname file currently loaded on Name Census, which is 2020. The historical section above also keeps any older Census surname entries we have for Blige (2000, 2010, 2020).
No. The Census Bureau only publishes surnames that appeared at least 100 times in a given decennial Census. That means very rare surnames are excluded entirely, and a surname can appear in one Census release but disappear from a later one if it falls below the reporting threshold.
There are two main reasons: rounding and suppression. The Census Bureau rounds published values, and it may suppress very small cells to protect privacy. For 2020, the Bureau also published raw group counts rather than direct percentages, so Name Census converts those counts back into shares for comparability across census years.
A habitational surname likely derived from a place name in France. The fuller origin note on this page goes into more detail.
All surname statistics on Name Census are drawn from the US Census Bureau's decennial surname frequency tables. These files list every surname that appeared 100 or more times in the 2020 Census, along with a count, a per-100,000 rate, and a self-reported demographic breakdown. You can read the full explanation on our methodology page.
For surnames, Name Census does not age cohorts the way it does for first names. Instead, it takes the Census Bureau's published frequency for Blige (0.10 per 100,000) and applies that rate to the current U.S. resident population to estimate how many living Americans have the surname today.
For a quick modern take, check how many Americans have the surname Blige on our sister site HowManyOfMe.org.